In your mind, what are the consequences for the party system of the Essay

In your mind, what are the consequences for the party system of the increasing verse of young Americans who do non identify wi - Essay ExampleIn this survey, the independents constitute 39% of the 18-24 year old voters and 45% of the 25-29 year old voters.1 The meaning of this development for the two parties is very important. Particularly, it affects their ability to win during elections. Independents are important for both the Republicans and the Democrats because they have been considered as swing votes, crucial in determining the victory of candidates from both parties. This is true given the fact that traditionally both have roughly the same number of membership. To demonstrate this point, one need not fancy further than the results of the previous U.S. presidential elections wherein no President had so far claimed an overwhelming support from the majority. Lewis-Beck, for instance, explained that the presidential election in the past had been especially close, with the fie ld popular votes split nearly evenly even when landslides occur such as the 1984 victory of Ronald Reagan, when the popular vote was split (59-41).2 This phenomenon demonstrates the importance of voters who are not identified with the Republican and antiauthoritarian parties. They are free to miscellanea their minds and vote outside of party lines. It also explains the variable that has perplexed many political scientists. With the federal agency of the Republican or the Democratic Party in an election, there is no guarantee that it stays in office long. In the American experience, there is stag alternation in power and when A Democrat is elected in the White House, it does not necessarily mean that his party will control the Congress. The young voters, with their horror to being identified with a particular political ideology, significantly erode the party identification phenomenon, which, for so long, has formed the fundamental support bases of the Republican and Democratic P arties. Jennings and Mann argued that such identification is the psychological force located near the middle of the funnel of causality at a distance from the ultimate dependent variable, which is the suffrage choice and characterizes a voters orientation to an important group during the elections. 3 Johnston (2006) referred to the successes of party identification during the 1960s and the immediate years afterwards when the political landscape was fixed according to its dynamics and how perceptions and preferences for candidates are largely dictated by party ideology.4 The case today, however, is increasingly different. During the 2008 presidential elections and the recently concluded electoral exercise, the tone of political campaign provided excellent insights. Political candidates focus their messages in such a way that they appeal to independent young voters by winning up the causes and issues that interest them and appeal to their preferences. Candidates were not shy about ad mitting this and it goes without any sound reasoning. Young voters are fertile grounds by which candidates could mold, guide and change opinions and perspectives. Several other issues underpin the dynamics and voting behavior of young independent voters. The first of these is that a losing political party is often not considered as decisively defeated and chances of bouncing back in the next elections are extremely high. The vote swing that has ensured narrow victory for the incumbent party could discharge to their side just as easily in the next elect